|
Your questions and
doubts on NFP are answered here, if you have any other questions on NFP, you
can call 9106 1990 or send an email to
nfpsin@hotmail.com.
Alternately, you can contact your local parish priest for
clarification.
Natural Family Planning (NFP) refers to the practice of
achieving or avoiding pregnancies according to an informed awareness
of a womans fertility.
NFP provides a medically safe, healthy, highly
effective and very low cost method of planning your family. It is
convenient (no birth control devices to use), and its immediately
reversible for achieving or avoiding pregnancy. It is increasingly
available throughout the world, it tells you when you have achieved
pregnancy, and its morally acceptable.
This rhetorical question takes many forms:
- “NFP and
contraception have the same intention of planning for the good of one’s
children. Both are contraceptive and moral.”
- “How is the
conscience of someone who uses contraception different from one who uses NFP?
They both want the same things – the good of the family.”
-
“NFP is the same as Contraception because both may aim to limit
family size.”
-
“Contraception is defined as ‘the practice of or method used in deliberately
preventing a woman becoming pregnant as a result of having sex’. Would this not
mean that the rhythm method or other NFP methods would fall under this
definition and be at risk of the ‘contraceptive mentality: loss of respect for
women and human life, the weakening of family, and population control by
governments?’ ”
-
“For the same grave reasons that make Natural Family Planning (NFP) morally
acceptable, wouldn't the use of a condom instead be just as moral? How then is
the condom any different from NFP?”
-
“Surely you can’t be saying that NFP and Contraception are different because one
is natural and the other artificial? What’s wrong with being artificial?”
-
“If every sexual act must remain open to the transmission of
life, then NFP is wrong too.”
[1]
and even
-
“In both NFP and Contraception the sperm cells
die, so they are the same.”
The recurring theme is that similar goals or effects
prove that they are the same, both contraceptive and immoral or both
family planning and moral.
The Answer:
Both NFP and contraception have to do with birth
regulation but how does that make them the same?
All crows are
birds and all eagles are birds but are crows eagles? Likewise,
both Men and Women are human beings but is a Man a Woman? Or we
could point to the hare (genus
Lepus) and the rabbit (seven
genera)
which look similar but are completely different animals. Or to
apples and oranges and even dukus and durians which are all fruits
yet different, one from the other.
Good intentions alone without licit methods are
insufficient. If you eat the poisonous mushroom you will die even
if you want it to be the delicious, and expensive, truffle.
What exactly is this difference?
Although both are
used to regulate birth, they do so in different ways. NFP
modifies sexual behaviour to suit fertility while contraception
suppresses fertility to suit behaviour.
They take opposite paths, and adopting one, either
one, means to develop the habits and culture that go with that
practice and to turn one’s back on the other – usually with far
reaching consequences.
The
words themselves imply the paths taken.
“Contra-ception”
means anti-conception and is commonly extended to
anti-pregnancy and anti-birth, so providing different
ways of getting rid of unwanted children in a sex-sparing, anti-life
package.
Contraceptives are never used to achieve
pregnancy, as the term ‘family planning’ should suggest.
They may plan for the good of some children but often
at the expense of other children, some of whom may be selected for
abortion. Experience
does show in fact that the trends of contraception and abortion are
often in direct relation, abortion having being legalised for the
purpose of recovery from failed contraception.
Contraceptives are not wrong merely because they are ‘artificial’.
They are intrinsically evil because they rupture God’s design of
Procreative Love, no matter what good intentions or results
we may have for using them.
“Natural Family Planning”
on the other hand means planning a family, not avoiding one,
as married couples decipher their cycles of fertility and
infertility in a truly unitive relationship that does not hinder the
transmission of life. ‘Natural’ refers to Natural Law, in line with
the order of Creation, not to the absence of pills or devices.
While
sexual intercourse, unlike nutrition, is unnecessary for
individuals, it is a part of married love and commits married
couples to the gift of fertility and to accept as many
children as they can take care of. But the Designer has also given
them a second gift, the gift of infertility in each
cycle, and for grave reasons they can use these infertile days to
space or even indefinitely postpone the next child.
Like following instructions in the designer’s manual,
NFP accommodates God's design. If the
more serious the matter is, like surgery or flying a plane, the
greater the disaster if we fail to follow the manual’s instructions,
why should it be any different with the creation of human life and
the way God has designed this?
Contraception is like locking the door and sending out the
rejection, “Don’t come. You’re not wanted,” but spacing pregnancy
with NFP uses the built-in mechanisms of our biology and is like
taking the opportunity provided by the Creator of Life to delay the
invitation to the next child.
Using NFP and using contraceptives are
thus different acts, separate from the intentions we may have for
using them. And the act must first be judged independently of these
intentions. This is because you can never do moral evil even
for worthy goals or consequences.[2]
[1]NFP
does not block the transmission of life. Sexual
intercourse is given to procreation but fecundity normally
means cyclical fertility until menopause – like a radio is
designed to produce music even though it’s sometimes off. NFP
is dedicated to this design and the sexual act is not
blocked to conception if and when this is possible.
But ‘contraception’ blocks a baby that could have resulted
from sex on fertile days. It changes the design of fecund
sex – like using the radio to hammer a nail into the wall.
Abstaining from sex is not ‘contraception’. After
all, celibates are not practising contraception. Nor is it
‘contraception’ to have sex on infertile days, since
conception is not possible then anyway.
[2]
If we do an intrinsically evil act because there are good
reasons for doing it, we would have to say that the evil
act is a good thing to do.
To thus misrepresent
evil as good makes good and evil indistinguishable
and would open the door to all evil acts since no one does
anything without a good reason.
Inevitably, this leads to the corruption of conscience and
to the increasing inability to make moral choices.
Perhaps we can point at the anti-baby milieu in which we live.
In a
culture that extols acquisitions the Child is not one of the 5 Cs.
On the contrary, decades of institutional denial and rejection of
babies has created the mindset that children are accidents and
unwanted burdens at worst, or optional extras or even cures for
infertility at best.
Not only does contraception violate the procreative
meaning of intercourse but also its unitive meaning, as it
disfigures the sexuality of husband and wife and obstructs the total
self-giving that is characteristic of love[3].
People below 50 years of age are born into this culture, with a
condom in the mouth, to borrow
the idiom of the silver spoon. And
women may now need to work outside the home without alternative
opportunities for child care, particularly during financial
reversals, which erodes their biological roles as mother and
home-maker.
Adulterated by contraception, sex itself has been de-linked from
procreation and is now little to do with babies. There is more and
more sex without babies and more and more babies without sex.
And
even when we have sexual relations using NFP, we may use it as a
contraceptive. The
words we use betray us. We ‘prevent’ pregnancy rather than ‘postpone’
one; we ‘make babies’ or ‘reproduce’ rather than ‘procreate’. And we
may even greet a
surprise pregnancy with,
“Oh no” instead of “Thank God for the gift”.
Choosing life is choosing love for people over things,
where children are more precious than the things they replace.
So we
need to cultivate or re-cultivate within ourselves a willingness to
co-operate with God to accept fertility and children as gifts we value and protect instead of
diseases we are afraid of and need to control.
NFP
is good in itself because it accommodates God’s design for
procreation, but it is no different from a contraceptive if the
goals for using it are illicit e.g. having sex using NFP to have
no children at all could be illicit. Used as a
contraceptive, NFP would be a contraceptive and would
then – and only then – merit the accusation, “NFP
is the same as Contraception.”
Clearly then the formation of conscience is essential, as Pope John
Paul II advised
on the occasion of the 20th
Anniversary of Humanae Vitae, 1988,
“Another way of
weakening the spouses’ sense of responsibility with regard to their
conjugal love is that of spreading information about natural methods
without accompanying it with adequate formation of conscience.”
If
these principles are followed,
marital sex will unite physical loving with fecundity, and
spouses will be able to develop a fine balance between the two aims
of marital sexuality, i.e. marital intimacy and children.
In summary, NFP modifies sexual behaviour to suit
fertility while contraception suppresses fertility to suit
behaviour.They take opposite paths, and adopting one, either one,
means to develop the habits and culture that go with that practice
and to turn one’s back on the other – usually with far reaching
consequences.
[3]
Inner beauty does not depend on recognition by the beholder
but on fidelity to God’s design. The husband who recognizes
the inner beauty of his wife is the fortunate one. In a
sense, he is seeing God.
It is scientifically established that during each
menstrual cycle a woman normally becomes fertile and then naturally
infertile. The fertile time is the part of her cycle when sexual
intercourse can result in pregnancy. A womans body provides certain
physically signs to indicate her fertile and infertile times.
The most used signs are a normal discharge of cervical
mucus and other signs include changes in her cervix and a feeling
called "ovulation pain".
Cervical mucus is natures way of helping a mans
sperms reach a womans egg. Her flow of cervical mucus generally
starts in a small way several days before she ovulates (releases an
egg), it is a very positive sign that her fertile time has started.
About the time she ovulates, her mucus may be abundant and have a
consistency something like raw egg white. After ovulation, her mucus
normally disappears.
The Billings Ovulation Method uses only the mucus and
the dryness as the signs of fertility and infertility. The other
signs are also used by many women.
No, The Rhythm Method was the Calendar Rhythm Method
developed in 1930. It was based on some biological averages, but it
did not work well for women who had irregular cycles. It was the
1930s model of NFP, and great progress has been made since then.
Yes, Modern NFP assumes that every woman is irregular
at least some of the time. In general, if her fertile time comes
earlier or later than usual, she knows about it because the start of
her cervical mucus comes earlier or later.
No, With NFPs Billings Ovulation Method, during
the day she takes a moment now and then to
become aware of her cervical mucus and at night she records a symbol
to describe her mucus. This simple process gives them an accurate day
to day picture of her fertility.
Yes, Natural Family Planning uses no birth control
devices or drugs. Every drug has potential side effects and should
be taken only when necessary to cure or relieve an illness etc. But
fertility is a normal process, not a disease. Birth control pills and
implants are unnecessary drugs, and most intrauterine devices (IUDs)
were taken off the market because of health related lawsuits; some
physicians have linked spermicides with birth defects.
NFP is health enhancing. Through NFP charting, a
woman becomes aware of her normal fertility menstrual cycle. Some
kinds of cycle irregularities can alert her to possible underlying
problems and she can seek early health-care assistance.
Numerous studies including one by the World Health
Organisation have shown that NFP can be used at the 98% level of
effectiveness for AVOIDING pregnancy. Thats equal to the birth
control pill and better than all the barrier methods.
Yes, with NFP you will become aware of the most fertile
days in your overall fertile time, and you will learn how to maximize
your mutual fertility.
In addition, your charted cycles may reveal certain
patterns that can contribute to infertility and which sometimes can be
corrected simply by better nutrition. Many couples of marginal
fertility are helped by NFP training to achieve much wanted
pregnancies and the charts of those who may need medical help can
assist the knowledgeable physician.
Yes, but only when a mother practices a very natural
form of baby care characterized by mother-baby closeness. This is
called "ecological breast-feeding" to distinguish it from "cultural
breast-feeding" which does not space babies.
In addition, ecological breast-feeding helps you to
keep your baby healthy and contributes greatly to the emotional
enrichment of both mother and baby.
Yes, all the major religions including the Catholic
Church accept the use of natural family planning when couples have a
sufficiently serious reason for spacing babies or family limitation.
On the other hand, the teachings of the Catholic
Church, some Orthodox churches, some part of the Judaism and an
increasing number of Protestants are opposed to sterilization and the
use of contraceptive or abortifacient drugs and devices. It should
be noted that intrauterine devices and birth control drugs (both the
pill and implants) can cause very early abortions.
In other words, is it natural for a married couple to
practice sexual self-control?. Yes. No one denies that at times
this is difficult, but such difficulties do not make periodic
continence "unnatural". "Natural" means living up to the demands of
our human mature "created in the image and likeness of God". All of
the Ten Commandments are sometimes difficult to follow, but all of
them spell out the challenge of being true to our own nature.
Sexual self-control can help build the marital
relationship and therefore most couples report that NFP has a positive
effect on their marriages. They find that periodic abstinence helps
keep their sexual relationship fresh, improves their communication,
and gives them a deeper respect for each other.
In addition, the practice of NFP helps to develop the
same strength of character that is necessary for marital fidelity and
lifelong marriage. NFP couples have an extremely low divorce rate. This makes sense because couples who respect the natural moral law,
God’s order of creation, can expect to enjoy its benefits.
Yes, but not automatically. Couples rarely begin to
practice Natural Family Planning out of a desire to improve their
marital relationship. However, if they are going to practice NFP
harmoniously, they soon find that they have to communicate more fully
and creatively with each other. Couples do not ignore each other at
times when they choose to avoid sexual relations, rather they develop
non-genital ways of expressing their love and affection, which is the
art of marital courtship.
The best way to learn NFP is to attend the classes of
the NFP Service, Family Life Society. Contact the
Centre nearest to your home. If you are
planning to get married, please allow yourself and your finance at
least 6 months of learning time to be familiar and confident with
NFP.
Please note: This Q&A has NOT taught you how to practice NFP.
Please contact our instructors at the NFP Centres and in the classes
you will learn how to interpret all the signs of fertility; you will
learn how to use them in a cross checking way or individually; and you
will learn how to apply this knowledge to your own cycle pattern with
professionally trained guidance. And much more!
|